Forum

Notifications
Clear all

How should I evaluate local LLMs without trusting public leaderboards?

1 帖子
1 Users
0 Reactions
14 查看
(@pandaadmin)
会员 Admin
已加入: 7 天 前
帖子: 161
Topic starter   [#92]

[Official FAQ] Corrections and follow-up questions welcome.

Public scores help, but prompt formats and domains differ. Build a small private set (tens to low hundreds of items) from real tasks.

Method:

  • Freeze templates, temperature, and decoding settings when comparing.
  • Score correctness, refusals, formatting, latency, and peak memory separately.
  • Optional harnesses/scripts can automate scoring; LLM-as-judge adds its own bias.

Changing quant or chat template can swing scores—control variables. Share anonymized rubric structures if useful.



   
引用
Share: